Studies done showing the harmful effects of vaccines


About VAC



For the latest daily vaccine
news see my you tube channel


Video page
Lots of videos from You Tube showing the harmful effects of vaccines such as Gardasil and Cervarix, and a whole lot more, including videos of those that have been effected by them as well.

Victims Photo Page
Lest we never forget those who have tragically suffered as a result of having a vaccine. Here are a collection of photos to remember those who have died and those that are still alive but suffering on a daily basis


Videos concerning vaccines

Swine Flu Prevention - cure

Many of the videos on You Tube feature information mainly from news articles, which are in text form below.

Articles 2001
Articles 2002
Articles 2003
Articles 2004
Articles 2005
Articles 2006
Articles 2007
Articles 2008
Articles 2009


Desiree Jennings Case

Natalie Morton Case

Stacy Jones

Gabi Swank Case


**MUST SEE**
Vital information on swine
flu vaccines - ingredients etc


Reported adverse reactions and
Side effects due to Gardasil vaccine
Swine Flu reported adverse
reactions and side effects


Are drugs like
 Tamiflu any better?


Guillain-Barre syndrome

Is the swine flu
vaccine totally safe?


UK only
Report a reaction yourself


Other important links

NVIC.org
NVICstandup (You Tube)
http://www.gardasil-talk.com
http://jenjensfamily.blogspot.com

Vitamin D?

Vitamin D Linked to Reduced Risk of Multiple Sclerosis (so could it also kick swine flu's butt?)
Aluminum Hydroxide in Vaccines Linked to Neurological Damage
Known as amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate now and found in HPV Gardasil vaccine

Just days after receipt of a 2009 flu shot, Desiree Jennings, a Washington Redskins Ambassador, developed dystonia brought on by the vaccine according to her doctors at John´s Hopkins. Dystonia is a rare, incurable neurological condition which causes body jerks and abnormal or repetitive movements that is brought on by infections, brain trauma, or a reaction to medications.

As autism and Gulf War veterans with fatigue and ailing health also abound, Americans increasingly question vaccine safety in the face of a pharmaceutical industry and government which consistently dismiss their concerns without providing any real evidence of vaccine safety and efficacy.

Now, scientific evidence shows that aluminum hydroxide, a vaccine adjuvant used to increase the response of the immune system, leads to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration, which may be linked to Gulf War Syndrome and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a multi-system disorder afflicting veterans the 1990-1991 Gulf War.

"Possible causes of GWS include several of the adjuvants in the anthrax vaccine and others. The most likely culprit appears to be aluminum hydroxide," says Shaw and Petrik, researchers at the Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Canada.

Aluminum-treated mice in a new study showed significant neuronal degeneration and the presence of aluminum in the spine cord and cortex after being treated with aluminum hydroxide preparations. This resulted in motor function impairment and reduced spatial memory capacity.

Shaw says the treated mice showed a consistent "pathological hallmark of various neurological diseases, including Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia. The demonstrated neurotoxicity of aluminum hydroxide and its relative ubiquity as an adjuvant suggest that greater scrutiny by the scientific community is warranted."

Aluminum hydroxide is a common vaccine adjuvant and can be found, along with mercury, in some flu vaccines.

Parents ought to closely examine the safety and ingredients of vaccines and alternate preparations before consenting to vaccination of their child.

Reference

Shaw CA, Petrik MS. Aluminum hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration. J Inorg Biochem. 2009 Aug 20.


Could Hepatitis B Vaccine Be Harmful?

(CBS)  In a newly-published study, vaccinated monkeys demonstrated “significant delays in the acquisition of critical survival reflexes" compared to an unvaccinated control group, reports CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson.

It was the first time researchers had time compared vaccinated animals with unvaccinated controls. Researchers vaccinated 13 newborn rhesus macaque monkeys with Hepatitis B vaccine containing a standardized amount of thimerosal - a vaccine preservative thought by some to cause developmental issues. The thimerosal dose matched that given to human babies until the early 2000s. Four monkeys received a saline placebo and three more had no shots at all.

The study found the unvaccinated animals developed normally, while the vaccinated monkeys demonstrated the survival reflex delays. According to one of the lead investigators, Dr. Laura Hewitson of the University of Pittsburgh, “Infants of lower birth weight and gestational age were at greater risk.”

The study, published last week in the scientific journal NeuroToxicology, was not designed to determine whether it was the thimerosal or another component of the vaccine that caused the observed delays.

“We undertook these experiments largely because we were unable to find any safety studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated animals,” said another study author, Dr. Andrew Wakefield of Thoughtful House, which provides resources for children with developmental disorders.



Cal-Oregon Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Survey

We surveyed over 9,000 boys in California and Oregon and found that vaccinated boys had a 155% greater chance of having a neurological disorder like ADHD or autism than unvaccinated boys." - Generation Rescue
-     Read our press release discussing the survey here.
-     Read an article from UPI Investigative reporter Dan Olmsted Discussing the survey: Study Sees Vaccine Risk.

If you are interested in learning about alternative vaccine schedules, please read our section titled On Vaccines.
Methodology

Generation Rescue commissioned an independent opinion research firm, SurveyUSA of Verona NJ, to conduct a telephone survey in nine counties in California and Oregon. Counties were selected by Generation Rescue. Interviews were successfully completed in 11,817 households with one or more children age 4 to 17. From those 11,817 households, data on 17,674 children was gathered. Of the 17,674 children inventoried, 991 were described as being completely unvaccinated. For each unvaccinated child, a health battery was administered.

Generation Rescue chose to use telephone interviews with parents to gather data on children, so as to closely mirror the methodology the CDC uses to establish national prevalence for NDs such as ADHD and autism through their national phone survey of parent responses. Generation Rescue chose to focus on children ages 4-17 to match the age range used by CDC.

Are parent responses a reliable indicator of a child's diagnostic status? According to Dr. Laura Schieve, co-author of the CDC's national phone survey study, in discussing the CDC's two phone surveys on autism prevalence, "the consistency of prevalence estimates across the two surveys supports high reliability or reproducibility of parental report of autism and reliability is one important component of validity."

SurveyUSA is a well-known national opinion research firm with unique expertise in canvassing local communities. SurveyUSA has no vested interest in any outcome this or any survey might produce. You can see a copy of the questionnaire used in the survey here. The data the survey intended to capture included:
-     Households with a child or children aged 4-17
-     Whether or not that child had been vaccinated
-     Whether or not that child had any one (or more) of the following diagnosis: ADD, ADHD, Asperger's, PDD-NOS, Autism, Asthma, or Juvenile Diabetes (the final two of which were added to consider other health outcomes).

The results of the survey allowed us to compare the prevalence (what percentage of children have a particular diagnosis) to see if there was any meaningful difference between unvaccinated and vaccinated children.

The most common way to measure prevalence differences is through a calculation known as relative risk or the Risk Ratio, where we compared prevalence amongst unvaccinated children to prevalence amongst vaccinated children. So, if 5% of unvaccinated children have asthma, and 10% of vaccinated children have asthma, that represents an "RR" of 2.0 (10%/5%), or a difference of 100%. We were also able to look at the data by gender, age, and county.
Results

SurveyUSA gathered data on 9,175 boys and 8,499 girls. Counties surveyed in California included:

    San Diego
    Sonoma
    Orange
    Sacramento
    Marin

Counties surveyed in Oregon included:

    Multnomah
    Marion
    Jackson
    Lane


The results of the survey can be accessed as a pdf file here. This is the primary data we received from SurveyUSA and it can be used for anyone to independently analyze our results.

Generation Rescue analyzed the data provided by SurveyUSA, and a copy of our analysis can be found here. The most notable results of our survey are with the boys, which is not surprising considering boys represent approximately 80% of total cases of NDs. Namely:
All vaccinated boys, compared to unvaccinated boys:
-     Vaccinated boys were 155% more likely to have a neurological disorder (RR 2.55)
-     Vaccinated boys were 224% more likely to have ADHD (RR 3.24)
-     Vaccinated boys were 61% more likely to have autism (RR 1.61)
Older vaccinated boys, ages 11-17 (about half the boys surveyed), compared to older unvaccinated boys:
-     Vaccinated boys were 158% more likely to have a neurological disorder (RR 2.58)
-     Vaccinated boys were 317% more likely to have ADHD (RR 4.17)
-     Vaccinated boys were 112% more likely to have autism (RR 2.12)
(Note: older children may be a more reliable indicator because many children are not diagnosed until they are 6-8 years old, and we captured data beginning at age 4.)
All vaccinated boys, removing one county with unusual results (Multnomah, OR), compared to unvaccinated boys:
-     Vaccinated boys were 185% more likely to have a neurological disorder (RR 2.85)
-     Vaccinated boys were 279% more likely to have ADHD (RR 3.79)
-     Vaccinated boys were 146% more likely to have autism (RR 2.46)
All vaccinated boys and girls, compared to unvaccinated boys and girls:
-     Vaccinated boys and girls were 120% more likely to have asthma (RR 2.20)
-     No correlation established for juvenile diabetes
All vaccinated girls, compared to unvaccinated girls:
-     No meaningful differences in prevalence were noted for NDs (which may be due to the smaller sample size of the study because girls represent about 20% of cases.)
Commentary

Generation Rescue is not representing that our study proves that the U.S. vaccine schedule has caused an epidemic in neurological disorders amongst our children. We are a small non-profit organization. For less than $200,000, we were able to complete a study that the CDC, with an $8 billion a year budget, has been unable or unwilling to do. We think the results of our survey lend credibility to the urgent need to do a larger scale study to compare vaccinated and unvaccinated children for neurodevelopmental outcomes.

It is also the opinion of Generation Rescue that we are over-vaccinating our children, and we encourage parents to use caution in how they choose to vaccinate their children, particularly boys. In the vaccine section of our website, we provide additional detail on vaccines and vaccinating safely and provide three alternative vaccine schedules parents may want to consider for their children.


I have read many articles by people claiming there is no benefits in any vaccines, some believe it even to be about population reduction, while others like me, believe it is about money, money, money, at the expense of health and safety.
So why does it seem to effect a few as they say and not the millions given it.
Could there be a ticking time bomb, something over time that will happen, or the more one gets vaccines the worse you become, especially for children, like in the US where they are giving them so many injections now by the time they are a few years old.

Anyway I came across the following which I found interesting, cause to me, like nuts, some don't have an allergy to them, and some do.
What I would like to see is testing, but they are never gonna do that before hand, cause again it's the cost as well as the time involved.

The study published this month in Nature Medicine, shows how formalin, used in the manufacture of over half of all vaccines, can alter the vaccine's effect on the immune system.

The Wellcome Trust and Medical Research Council funded research shows that formalin causes chemical damage to vaccine proteins and creates reactive chemical groups called carbonyls. The immune system reacts strongly when it spots this damage.

In many cases, deliberately adding carbonyls to a vaccine can improve the body's immune response, such as with hepatitis A vaccines. However, in others, the presence of carbonyls can mean that the immune system overreacts once infection occurs and attacks the body in a damaging way.

In the 1960s, carbonyls in experimental vaccines for a virus known as RSV, which causes wheezy colds in children, triggered a powerful immune response that caused severe side effects leading to hospitalisation and several deaths. (Click here for article)


I have a moto though, we a few actually, saying, and this one goes, 'If in doubt, leave it out.'

So this is what I'm doing making parents and children aware of the risks involved with taking any injection full of chemicals mixed together, some of which many, including doctors, don't believe should be put inside our bodies at all.

Kind regards, Lee.